Greg Detre
Wednesday, October 09, 2002
see Regier
& Carlson, �Grounding spatial language�
would it be
fair to say that their results aren�t that left-right symmetrical??? if we take
into account this noise, then are their �above�-related results still
statistically valid???
a 5x5
matrix isn�t very fine-grained � presumably, this is to make the stats a bit
more tractable � but does it affect/undermine their results in the slightest???
I have a confused hunch that even having a 30x30 grid wouldn�t really affect
their conclusions at all
I don�t understand how the manipulated/controlled the proximal vs
centre-of-mass orientations???
or how they did the wide/tall landmark size in such a fixed-size grid???
none of the
models appear to show the important horizontal asymmetry in the empirical
results when faced with right-angled triangles, do they???
PC-BB???